Posts tagged migration

class-struggle-anarchism:

In the last week 6,400 immigrants were arrested and detained in Greece.

Yesterday hundreds of Roma families are rounded up and evicted in France.

It’s a bad time to be an outsider in Europe.

*correction from a migrant in Europe: its a bad time to be a poor outsider in Europe… at least in Britain there’s a shiny loophole for those with deep pockets. …ah class war.

in case it isn’t clear, i’m using humour to make my point.

357 notes 

Warning: existential read.

Texas is a messed up place. I think, possibly, only a federated state which previous was its own country can be this messed up.

The first photo is from a petrol station toilet. I have no idea what a sexual ‘grab bag’ might include, although the Brit mates hypothesised over pints upon my return, as social science PhDs are wont to do.

The second and third photos are from a local favourite eatery, Sealand. Yes, it is the land of the delicious sea. Not making this up: while at dinner there with my partner, we overheard, “If the restaurant is called Sealand, why are there paintings of birds on wall?!” … they were herons. Anyhow, you can’t make this stuff up.

The last two photos are something I struggle with. Minnie was my grandma who died just after her 75th wedding anniversary two weeks ago. My grandpa said after their story was published in the local paper (see link), many people came to visit them in care home to say their story was a source of inspiration.

My grandma died just before her 99th birthday; she is buried next to her mother, who I am named after, who died in her early 90s. My grandma is also buried near her sister who also lived to a ‘ripe ole age’.

I MAY have been to church that day and had too much scotch on an empty stomach and had a massive breakdown at the cemetery for two reasons. First, this Christian ritual of burying the dead doesn’t sit right with me. In Britain, its become much less common (unless you want to be laid to rest near Karl Marx in Highgate), and I am much more comfortable with burning the dead. Just knowing their bodies are beneath my feet is a huge source of unnecessary, attachment-based grief. A counselor once asked me if I am Buddhist because it made all the death in my life easier to deal with. She was probably right, but I think this whole Christian burial is far too torturous. Second, I DO NOT WANT TO LIVE UNTIL I’M 90-something, and ALL the women on this side of my family do.

I’ve been through my fair share of ‘hard knocks’, and undertaking a PhD in a ‘foreign’ country has certainly exacerbated these, but this year I’ve learned one very hard lesson… I think. There’s not much purpose to life, to our individual lives… other than the old ‘Keep calm and carry on’.

My grands ‘pulled themselves up from their bootstraps’ (if this was a thing then, it certainly is not now); they went from Great Depression-broke to comfortable. They had a family, a close family; they worked hard in community service and were fortunate enough to enjoy 75 years with a partner who was truly a partner. This is outstanding. This is the best we can hope for. But, at the end of it all, we’re still alone. We outlive our partners, and we outlive our bodies. In our youth and middle age, we command our bodies. In our old age, our bodies command us, never knowing when the next emergency run to the toilet will interrupt our regularly scheduled programme. 

I know my grands are just ONE example, but I honestly feel like their lives are the BEST example of a good life… and in the end, first-hand, its awful. When we are younger, we always wish the world would just PAUSE: for a nap, for time with family, for time to read, for time to relax. When we age, there’s nothing but time: time alone, time to reflect, time to regret, time to read but we can’t see, time to holiday but we can’t walk.

I guess this whole post is just my way of saying the human condition is a shit condition. I regret coming here for my PhD, a year before finishing I regret it almost 100%. And if you are considering one, I’d advise thinking twice. But a very kind friend recently sent me something from EE Cummings:

because you take life in your stride(instead
of scheming how to beat the noblest game
a man can proudly lose,or playing dead
and hoping death himself will do the same)

because you aren’t afraid to kiss the dirt
(and consequently dare to climb the sky)
because a mind no other mind should try
to fool has always failed to fool your heart

but most(without the smallest doubt) because
no best is quite so good you don’t conceive
a better; and because no evil is
so worse than worst you fall in hate with love

–human one mortally immortal i
can turn immense all time’s because to why

I think its meant to be encouraging. So reflecting on Texas being so messed up - the world being so messed up - my grands’ story and life, and my own regret and current personal hell that is elite education … I am certain there is no point in life, and I think that’s what Cummings is trying to say as well. That there is no point and life, as a state of being, is pretty awful - the good is the exception, not the rule - but the best we can try to do is keep challenging ourselves to endure the awful, the hardship, the regret.

To turn our cheek and try to silence the awful with drugs, sex, gluttony, envy, or such vices is to miss the nature of the experience that is life.

I think what I’m trying to say is, migration, war, genocide, discrimination, poverty, hunger… these are the rules, anything else is the exception. The purpose in living the unpurposeful life is to endure.

Illegitimi non carborundum

this is my only academic accomplishment this week.

1 note 

just an fyi, Economist, just because a city has a large international population, doesn’t mean they appreciate it. …London is the motivational heart of Britain’s sweeping immigration reform.
There’s nothing brilliant about gentrification, discrimination in employment, or the massive wage/wealth gap that still cripples London Britain, astounding the entire world on how a country SO BROKE can still function.
theeconomist:

Tomorrow’s cover today: in praise of the world’s most international city. If only the rest of Britain properly appreciated it.

just an fyi, Economist, just because a city has a large international population, doesn’t mean they appreciate it. …London is the motivational heart of Britain’s sweeping immigration reform.

There’s nothing brilliant about gentrification, discrimination in employment, or the massive wage/wealth gap that still cripples London Britain, astounding the entire world on how a country SO BROKE can still function.

theeconomist:

Tomorrow’s cover today: in praise of the world’s most international city. If only the rest of Britain properly appreciated it.

96 notes 

That’s it. I’ve had it.

Dear World,

No.Just stop.It’s enough.

You are being an asshole for the pure enjoyment of being an asshole. I’ve got enough on my plate with this crippling poverty and pressure to finish my PhD. We’re STUDENTS for fuck’s sake.

Best,

L.

*sorry for the potty mouth.

UKBA has announced changes to the immigration rules for over-stayers that come into effect from 1st October 2012. Previously if you over-stayed in the UK you were permitted to make a new extension application in the UK, even though your immigration permission had expired. However, under the new immigration rules, if your immigration permission has expired more than 28 days ago, if you apply for an extension from the UK, your application will be refused. This means that if you have over-stayed in the UK for more than 28 days you need to go home to make a new application. If you have over-stayed in the UK by more than 90 days you cannot make a new application from the UK or from overseas which means you would be subject to a 12 month ban from returning to the UK.

 

If you make an extension application in the UK while your immigration permission is still valid and your application is rejected you will be classed as an over-stayer from the date that you are notified that your application has been rejected, not from the date that your immigration permission expired. The date you are considered to have been notified is the second day after the date on the letter from UKBA.

‘more open borders, not less’

oooooo multimedia format 2 min lecture (drool)

progressiveauspol:

Top three myths about Immigration debunked

10 notes 

This is Theresa May. Learn her face; learn her name. She is heading this government’s ‘war’ on UK migration; well, let’s be fair - England’s war on migration.
On Sunday, May confirmed that Britons will not be allowed to bring in non-EU spouses who earn less than £18,500/year. That’s a link about why its ‘nasty’. This is a piece by UK-born (Pakistani by culture) comedian Shazia Mirza about why May’s plan won’t make a difference in the government’s pre-existing ‘brokeness’. And this is an piece on why and how immigration in the UK has become SO political.
The ‘thing’ is twofold:
1) Many people discount the experience of being an immigrant in the UK today. Try living under this thumb. I’ve always been at the stick end of public policy (because I’m female), but this is truly the -excuse me- shit end. Living every day knowing the date on my visa is no longer valid, and seeing news like this EVERY MONTH. Well, I know it will sound like a ‘middle class problem’ because obviously I can still afford to undertake my PhD here (see current debt total). However, its really a tough world to exist in when whether I open my mouth or show my face, I will be discriminated against. Tough world to write a PhD thesis in Politics, at least. And I’ve got it better than most…
2) THIS IS CLASS WAR! Most people in Britain KNOW that non-EU migration is not the problem, but what reason do most Britons have to stick out there neck and say, “This is wrong.” If you’re not from a migrant family, you’re not really affected. Considering the relative costs of political participation … well, there’s not much hope for us migrants, is there?

This is Theresa May. Learn her face; learn her name. She is heading this government’s ‘war’ on UK migration; well, let’s be fair - England’s war on migration.

On Sunday, May confirmed that Britons will not be allowed to bring in non-EU spouses who earn less than £18,500/year. That’s a link about why its ‘nasty’. This is a piece by UK-born (Pakistani by culture) comedian Shazia Mirza about why May’s plan won’t make a difference in the government’s pre-existing ‘brokeness’. And this is an piece on why and how immigration in the UK has become SO political.

The ‘thing’ is twofold:

1) Many people discount the experience of being an immigrant in the UK today. Try living under this thumb. I’ve always been at the stick end of public policy (because I’m female), but this is truly the -excuse me- shit end. Living every day knowing the date on my visa is no longer valid, and seeing news like this EVERY MONTH. Well, I know it will sound like a ‘middle class problem’ because obviously I can still afford to undertake my PhD here (see current debt total). However, its really a tough world to exist in when whether I open my mouth or show my face, I will be discriminated against. Tough world to write a PhD thesis in Politics, at least. And I’ve got it better than most…

2) THIS IS CLASS WAR! Most people in Britain KNOW that non-EU migration is not the problem, but what reason do most Britons have to stick out there neck and say, “This is wrong.” If you’re not from a migrant family, you’re not really affected. Considering the relative costs of political participation … well, there’s not much hope for us migrants, is there?

1 note 

GPOY - me at (almost indefinitely) the happiest moment of my life: when my husband was able to obtain a visa and join me in Manchester. ‘Who could ask for anything more?’

4 notes 

Update: its (still) raining in Manchester

After over a year of being apart, my husband returns to Britain (legally) tomorrow evening. I’ve been trying to control my squees with countless dinners and dates with the colleagues (hence no tumbling), but I SIMPLY CANNOT CONTAIN MYSELF ANY LONGER!!!!

The way ‘we’ have conceptualised (im)migration is entirely inaccurate and unjust/unequal/unfair. I’m here to say, if you are a non-EU citizen and you want to (im)migrate to an EU nation, you must have money, especially if you want to stay for more than 5 years (Theresa May). My husband and I exhausted the books on visa options that would grant us a life with an annual income over £11,000 (my student aid), but Britain simply will not have it. After being apart for over a year, succumbing to exhaustion and poor mental and physical health, we caved and lobbied my family for £8,000 a year until January 2015. £19,000 a year teeters on the edge of the poverty line, but at a certain point in life you realise it IS better to be poor and miserable together than poor and miserable apart.

So this is me, first hand - a Politics PhD (in progo) w a CV that warrants merited funding (w/out actually receiving any because of my fee status as an overseas student) - saying if you want to expatriate from the United States and move to Europe (short OR long-term), you better come from money. …and that there is something inherently flawed about our system of (im)migration.

nb: don’t expect ANY posts from me next week. i won’t make you wonder where I’ll be, but it won’t be near tumblr.

New Batch Scheme from UKBA being released 6 April.
Expected:
end of the post study work visa
increase in monthly financial requirements per dependent (in and outside of London)
increase in fees required to process new/updated visas internally
5-year maximum stay for all migrants earning less than £32/£35,000 per annum

New Batch Scheme from UKBA being released 6 April.

Expected:

  • end of the post study work visa
  • increase in monthly financial requirements per dependent (in and outside of London)
  • increase in fees required to process new/updated visas internally
  • 5-year maximum stay for all migrants earning less than £32/£35,000 per annum

(Source: thesubversivesound)

2,666 notes 

Say your not bigoted enough Fox [News] will help you with your bigotry…
… It was just some stories about, uh …
Immigrants, they’re very worried about the immigrants;
And Gays, they’re very worried about gays,
and paedophiles.
I think that immigrants - don’t worry too much about immigrants because that’s just a person that used to be somewhere else. That’s just a person that’s moved from one place to another place. That’s not that frightening…
“OH, HAVE YOU ALWAYS BEEN THERE?!”
“No, no I used to be there.”
Where will you go next?!
You’re not static; you’re an unstable object moving around on a rock in infinite space. Where will you go next?
How will we tax it correctly?

Russell Brand on Fox News and The Daily Mail’s shared fear of immigrants, gays and paedophiles.

Amnesty International Secret Policeman’s Ball 2012.

Link will only work in Britain.

My husband just submitted his visa application for a spouse of a Tier 4 student.

In today’s global world, citizenship is still entirely nationalistic. I’ve said numerous times how ridiculous I believe it is that capital is allowed to flow freely between states, but labour is not.

My husband is a highly skilled migrant with 8 years of experience in his field. He’s been a qualified candidate for more than a few applied positions in Britain. Last week a job he was qualified and nominated for was canceled after the EU preferential hiring scheme review was conducted. He is a skilled labourer; but because he is not an EU labourer, his candidacy is often dismissed because of his (non-EU) nationality.

The spouse of a Tier 4 student is prohibited from working or volunteering. As a Tier 4 student I am restricted to work/volunteer 20 hours a week, and the EU preferential hiring scheme check is conducted, except in University teaching. …and anyone in academia these days know how hard teaching contracts are to win for more than 6 months.

In spite of all this, if his application is successful, we will be together again. My husband and I have been married almost 2 years, and in one week, we will have lived apart for a year. Its impossible to convey in words how difficult it is to continue undertaking a PhD in politics, seeing the world today, while living without your newly-wed spouse, especially when you’re married to my spouse *eyebrow lift*.

This video is kind of how I imagine it will go if his application is successful, and we meet at Manchester airport in, what we hope will be only, a few months.

To the UKBA: please.

More than 40,000 skilled migrants a year are to lose their right to work beyond five years in Britain, in a move towards creating a temporary “guestworker” migrant labour force in the UK.

The home secretary, Theresa May, will tell MPs on Wednesday that she is breaking the link between migration and settlement for the first time, by taking away the right to remain in Britain for more than five years from any migrant worker earning less than £35,000 a year.

See the Guardian

A beginning lecturer at the University of Manchester (with a completed PhD) will make less than £35,000 a year.  This government’s war on immigration will have a profound effect on Britain’s political economy. The diversity of Britain’s workforce, let alone academia, will be sacrificed if May gets her way. Judging by this government’s track record, she very well may. Britain has always been beheld for its academic institutions. Increased fees, costly opportunities for entering junior faculty, and costly visa restrictions/requirements further endanger these historic institutions. We are facing a reversal of a historical base of Britain’s political economy - educated/skilled migrants, especially from academia.

More from the Guardian:

“Ministers accept that our economy needs skilled migrants to come and work at levels below £35,000 a year, but have decided that even if they work hard, pay their taxes, and play by the rules, they will be forced to go home after five years,” said Matt Cavanagh of the thinktank the Institute of Public Policy Research.

“This makes no sense in economic terms, will cause big problems for employers, and is unfair on individual migrants. It could also discourage the ‘brightest and best’ from coming here in the first place. The majority of working migrants don’t stay permanently anyway, but they value the option, and if Britain no longer offers it, they may go elsewhere.”

nb: my husband is a satellite engineer with 8 years of experience in his field. he possesses the required EU certifications (not an entry-level requirement). he is well qualified. for the second time in 2 years, a skilled engineering position he was up for in the UK has been terminated after review of the EU preferential hiring scheme ‘until further notice’. our efforts, at this point, are futile. this discrimination based on nationality has to end in Europe. if a migrant is qualified for a position, they have a right to be considered a qualified candidate - not dismissed on basis of nationality.

See also from the Guardian:

Conservatives accused of holding back economic recovery

Chris Grayling meets businesses to reassure them about work scheme

1 note